iPad: Beyond the Hate and the Hype
February 2nd, 2010
Flickr CC Credit: James Jordan
No matter which side of the argument you fall on when it comes to the iPad, you have to admit it’s got people pretty wound up.
Update: Ben Fry has a fantastically reasoned and sober account of the pros and cons of the iPad on his blog, well worth the read.
I could have predicted the reaction amongst my friends well in advance; those that are in the Anti-Apple camp are using it as an opportunity to make a claim that the emperor has no clothes. Those of a Pro-Apple persuasion are trying to justify the shiny, shiny purchase. I thought I’d throw my hat in the ring and tell you why I think the iPad is not the all-encompassing saviour it was made out to be but a positive sign of things to come.
First, let’s get the inevitable out of the way; If your reading this, it’s a safe bet you know me. And to know me is to know my love of Apple. I’m vocal about the thrill I still get from my MacBook Pro, I have an iPhone glued to the palm of my hand and recently was gifted with an Apple TV which despite an awkward courtship I have grown to love (more on that in a future post).
When Steve Jobs is in the house, I get excited. I hang on his every word and for a good hour after one of his dog and pony shows, I’m giddy like a Gran on gin.
Here’s a myth I’d like to disperse with straight away. Us, so-called Fan-boys aren’t in the gripe of some magical force that renders us completely unable to think. On the contrary; the come down is rough. When the shows over and the scorn and derision starts to come poring in, it’s hard not to feel like you have been cheated, and begin to question everything you have been told.
This is the source of the conflict; the vast majority of people who have been waiting in the wings can now now justify their hatred of Apple using concrete facts and inherent shortcomings in the product. The gut reaction then, for the Apple fan, is to take the defensive until you have two groups of people, each getting more melodramatic than the last.
The backlash that Apple provokes can be a good thing. We as humans are free thinkers and logical, if we didn’t question everything before us then we wouldn’t have made it out of the caves. Apple products are things of such beauty that we need the reality check of debate and point, counter-point to remind us that companies like to manufacture the myth of perfection. The reality is often far removed from hype.
The most common problem one finds in an Apple “debate”, is that the people on the Anti-Apple side have rarely used one of their devices. Yes, there are big problems with being locked down to a property format that comes from buying into a closed, profit driven eco-system, but the sheer beauty and ease of use makes that fact easier to live with.
And that’s where I want to come to the main thrust of this post (at last, you say!)
Forgive me an anecdote; my girlfriend’s niece got hold of my iPhone and without any prompting what-so-ever, she opened up the photos app and started to paw through my snaps, looking for and identifying friends and family.
She is two years old.
When a user interface is so instinctual that a two year old that carries no preconceptions about how a computing device should function, can operate an advanced device like a “smart phone”, then surely even the most stanch hater of anything shipped out from Cupertino, California, has to admit that something significant is happening here.
This is were the Apple iPad will succeed and why, understandably, the critics have been so savage. It is the first major product to represent a sea change that has been happening in human computer interactions for the last few years, for better or worse.
I’d argue for the better; every human’s life would be positively transformed with the adoption of a constantly net-connected, always-on computing device. Just look at the effort being expended to develop the world’s first $100 PC. The problem is that up until recently, the things that you and I take for granted are intimidating to the novice and require a steep learning curve. It’s easy to scoff at the relative that doesn’t know what a desktop is, or thinks that Google is the internet but it’s not obvious till you know.
Why did the Wii become the biggest selling console of this generation when it’s tech specs are so laughable when compared to it’s rivals? Because despite it’s shortcomings (and stupid name) it did away with the first intimidating, stumbling block for the beginner; the joypad and relied instead on something as natural as making gestures to afford control.
Start with a computer and take away all the clutter, the mouse, the keyboard, the space it occupies on your desk. Make it thin, light as book, make it feel right in your hand, familiar. Rely on instinct, no preconceptions and stimulate the simple pleasures gained from a highly visual, physical interaction. Hyperbole is easy, but surely this is significant.
Does this mean things have to be dumbed down for your Gran (the one on the gin)? No, it cuts out the wasted mental effort for all of us. If the task at hand is to send a photo to a friend, then the method used to achieve that goal should be so natural as to be almost invisible or at least, a pleasure and that’s what Apple are striving for. That and admittedly a massive money making machine, but come on, they are a company after all and exist in a free marketplace that will judge them accordingly.
I’m not saying that the iPad is some kind of miracle, utopian device or that it will sell well (at 50% mark up, it doesn’t need to). Heck, it’s not even an original concept but the sheer volume of press coverage alone guarantees it will be the loudest argument for this kind of device. The locked down nature of the app store / formats and it’s lack of common interfaces (USB, HDMI out etc) is lamentable. But it is an important step towards that holly mecca of user interface design – no required pre-knowledge, just instinct, and that’s got to be a good thing.

























Hey Steve,
On the Wii point I would perhaps argue that it’s not just because of the intuative nature of the new control method but that the new control method had the wow factor to consumers, something i’m not as convinced the iPad has to the same degree. Especially without getting your hands on one. Although if enough people buy the device then this could perhaps get it in front of people that would not even consider it, kinda like the Wii. I suspect at this point though the price would become the main pohibitive factor. I guess what I’m saying is that I dont think it will be a global sucess just on it’s ui alone, it needs more.
I do think it has a lot of scope though with updates to the OS. I think when it gets an update we may start seeing more uses (multitasking etc..etc..unkown apple majik) that may validate a purchase to a greater crowd.
I like the look of the iPad and would love to have one to play with but I dont need one or have the money for it.
So…can someone buy me one please, then I may learn to love apple.
nachos
Agree with you on the need to get it out in front of people before it starts gaining any real traction. Steve Fry said the same thing too – to use one was to fall in love with it – http://www.stephenfry.com/2010/01/28/ipad-about/
I guess that’s what the Apple Stores are for and they will no doubt leverage them that the same way they did with the iPhone. i.e Apple drum up a lot curiosity which leads people to investigate and play with them in store. If Apple strike up a deal with mobile carriers, they will once again have a opportunity to demo the product.
Also, your right about it not quite meeting a need for heavy computer users like you and I and perhaps that’s one thing I overlooked in my post; A few killers apps could alone generate a strong use case for the device.
But no, I’m not buying you one =)
Heh! Despite you using my Tweet to illustrate your point, I’m not “anti-Apple”! Apple make great products (once they iron out their initial issues). If I could spare the cash, I’d have an iPhone and a Macbook! The thing is, despite having cool interfaces, and great looking designs, Apple products don’t allow you to do anything which you can’t do with other products. They just let you do many things in an easier, cooler way (although for a higher price).
What I was having a go at is the excitement generated by an innovation in form rather than innovation in function.
You say a 2-year-old can use an iPhone – Well, when I was 7 I could program my ZX Spectrum in Spectrum BASIC. Does that make BASIC as good as C++? Well, if you just want to make the screen pretty colours, then I suppose yes it is. But if you want to do anything more complex, then no.
If the task at hand is to send a photo to a friend, then Apple is your company. If you want to browse the net, write a tune, design a flyer, etc.. Macs rule.
However, if you want to take a 235Mb CSV list with 1841178 rows; extract columns 1, 14, and 15; Remove the quotation marks from the text in column 1; and output the results to another file in a mixture of CSV and tab-delimited format ignoring any rows where the value in column 14 is zero (as I had to yesterday), then all the touch-screens and nice icons in the world are not going to help you!
So I join you in applauding Apple’s skill in bringing new tech to the general public in an easy to use form for day-to-day computing. Just don’t ask me to get excited about it!
@Paul Ah, right I understand where you are coming from now. I have swapped your tweet for someone else’s – plenty of negative tweets to choose from
It was our previous twitter debate over JQuery that led me to believe you were down on the Jobs. I think your comments here are very fair. Apple certainly haven’t reinvented computing for eveyone but are indeed repackaging it for the masses. As someone that is all about the user experience, that gets me tremendously excited but to anyone of a more nuts & bolts nature, I can see how it would be irksome.
I only wish this was the kind of discussion going on over the rest of the web rather than all the cheat beating!
I really just don’t get the iPad. I can see the iPhone as a good piece of technology, but my main issue with the iPad is that it’s pretty much useless. You can’t do work on it, and what fun you can have with it you can do on the iPhone. It does look cool, and I was almost taken in by it, but there’s literally noone who will benefit from having this product.
As for being a new, amazing product – that’s total rubbish – it is, as I Tweeted, just a big iPhone (without the phone)!
Also, it’s freakin’ HUGE!!! Just by a netbook…
@chris wow, I couldn’t disagree more.
Just look at this video from Wired showing you how they intend to present the tablet version of their mag and tell me you don’t get goose bumps. http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/02/the-wired-ipad-app-a-video-demonstration/
See, even if the iPad turns out to be just a bigger, super charged iPhone, that itself would be a game changer.
I use my iPhone for non phone stuff about an hour a day; it’s the place I get my news fix over breakfast and lunch via RSS feed reader and various News Apps. I prefer to use twitter and facebook on my iPhone because not only is it more convenient but my Laptop put me in work mode AND the experiences are actually better.
I can only use it in short bursts though because it hurts my eyes squinting at its wee 2×4 inch screen. Something that can fill my hand and I can make big gestures with; extraordinary.
As for Netbooks; they are the biggest joke sprung on the general public. I really don’t get them. It’s the worst of both world’s; totally underpowered, too small for an serious use. Laptops these days are so light and powerful, don’t be a tight ass, spend the money and get something you can use as a desktop replacement and take on the road.
“It’s the worst of both worlds; totally underpowered, too small for any serious use”. I thought you liked the iPad
I used netbooks as the example because they’re about the same price/size as an iPad but with infinite more uses, obviously a super lightweight laptop is better. You can also get touch screen ones so I see no need for the iPad.
The fact that touch screen tablet PCs have been around for ages and not taken off is proof enough for me that it’s not a very good idea.
If it leads to those cool paper-like screens that you can roll up then fair enough, but they’re not there yet…the iPad’s just a gimmick that you don’t need.
Whether you need one or not isn’t the point; it isn’t a vital device by any stretch and isn’t presented as one.
The iPad is a casual device and that’s one thing that has got people’s backs-up, how dare Apple create a computing device to have fun with, blimey!
The reason touch screen tablets have been slow to take off is because frankly (from what little I’ve seen of them) they suck ass and have failed to capture the world’s attention. There were plenty of smart phones before the iPhone dropped, but it took Apple to come in to get the attention, revolutionize the market and make eveyone up their game. Nothing stopping them doing that again.
I know I can’t change your mind so we will have to just wait and see how it fairs!